Posts

Why EHRs Don’t Have to be a Hindrance

Doctors persistently claim that electronic health record (EHR) systems take up too much of their time.

Bearing out that assertion, a just-published study in Annals of Family Medicine found that a cohort of 142 primary care physicians spent more than half their workday interacting with their EHR during and after clinic hours. Worse, the physicians, who were retrospectively followed through EHR event logs over the course of three years, allocated two-thirds of their computer-facing time to clerical and inbox work.

A separate commentary earlier this year issued a stark challenge to the healthcare IT industry: “[Talk] to ten practitioners at random who are involved in day-to-day emergency medicine or primary care medicine, the guys and gals on the busy front line, and find two of them who are enamored with their [EHR] tools.” The author, small-town physician Kenneth Bartholomew, MD, describes systems designed around billing and collections functions. Such EHRs, he argues, lack the ability to actually improve the workflow of diagnosis and patient management.

Closing the gap on EHR drawbacks

The clearly frustrated Dr. Bartholomew concludes that current EHRs put the wrong tools in the hands of everyday caregivers. While EHRs help assemble patient history, along with physical and laboratory evidence, the technology requires doctors to “push the chain” of information from behind — rather than “pulling it from the front.”

Nonetheless, it’s also important to recognize EHRs’ positive impacts within a digital, connected healthcare environment. Evidence of benefits include:

  • cost savings derived from prevention of adverse drug events;
  • enabling access by emergency personnel to patients’ pre-existing health information (such as medication lists, allergies, and medical histories);
  • use of medical histories to remind physicians of the best methods of care for specific patients; and
  • improvement of reporting, investigation, response, and communication between public health officials and clinicians.

What’s more, EHRs have been shown to mitigate risk for healthcare providers and health systems by enabling evidence-based decisions at the point of care, aiding in research directed toward improvements in care, and preventing liability actions by documenting complete records of care and informed consent.

Also, significant, EHRs can help drive up patient satisfaction. More than 90 percent of patients report being happy that their doctor used EHR-powered e-prescribing capabilities — and that they rarely encounter prescriptions not being ready at their connected pharmacy.

EHRs and interoperability

Looking ahead, the federal Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has prioritized enhancing EHR usability, as well as facilitating seamless exchange of information among different EHR systems. In fact, the 21st Century Cures Act, enacted at the end of 2016, specifies the development of a national framework and common agreement to promote comprehensive network-to-network health data sharing. ONC will be organizing work in these areas and expects to have preliminary plans in place by next year.

NetDirector actively supports strong, automated integration of EHR capabilities throughout the healthcare ecosystem. Hospitals and physicians can deploy NetDirector’s HealthData Exchange to normalize data to standard HL7 and other formats to achieve EHR interoperability while removing the bottlenecks of traditional interfacing — all without adding hours to the physician’s already hectic schedule.

For more information, please contact us or request a free demo.

NetDirector Enters Comprehensive Agreement to Partner with My Constant Care, LLC for Integration Services

TAMPA, Fla.Sept. 28, 2017 /PRNewswire/ — NetDirector, a cloud-based data exchange and integration platform, has expanded their Integration-Platform-as-a-Service (iPaaS) offerings once again. A strong partnership has been forged with My Constant Care, LLC to provide them with a cloud based integration suite for the already cloud-centric company.

My Constant Care (MCC) provides a unified cloud-based platform for integration and delivery of preventive services such as Annual Wellness Visits, Chronic Care Management, Advanced Care Planning, and Preventative Screenings. Their turnkey delivery model provides patients with the full spectrum of preventive services to enhance overall care delivery without disrupting day-to-day operations of the practice. My Constant Care focuses on maximizing value to both providers and patients. They do this with expert coordination of preventive care options available today while strategically shaping these services to meet performance requirements expected of their future providers in the future. They offer a no-financial-risk solution to the physicians, providing the staff, software, and technology to perform their services.

Utilizing the cloud for integration was a clear next step to elevate the services offered by MCC. NetDirector’s One-to-Many style integration allows MCC to connect to NetDirector once and exchange data seamlessly with EHR systems, billing platforms, and more as the hub expands. Now, MCC’s services can integrate with existing provider platforms as well as future additions to a provider’s suite of technology solutions without relying on internal resources to bridge the gap between solutions.

My Constant Care helps primary care physicians provide a level of service to their Medicare population previously not achievable by small practices,” says Kellie Privette, the Director of Sales and Business Development at MCC. Privette added that “NetDirector’s integration expertise and technology allows MCC to seamless transfer patient data into their customer’s EHR and billing systems, without double entry of a substantial amount of information.”

This integration also increases a provider’s compliance, allowing even small practices to provide the quality and timeliness of service of a larger provider while maintaining and exceeding compliance standards for the healthcare technology industry. By eliminating data entry steps and automating the exchange of patient information securely, the integration allows for providers utilizing My Constant Care to focus more on the patients, and less on the technology behind the scenes.

“We’re very enthusiastic about our partnership with My Constant Care,” said Harry Beisswenger, CEO of NetDirector. “Their services fill a gap in the healthcare industry, and we’re looking forward to helping them achieve their goals of seamless preventive care for everyone.”

Company Bio:

NetDirector provides a secure cloud-based data and document exchange solution for the healthcare and mortgage banking industries to deliver seamless data integration between parties. NetDirector bridges gaps created by disparate systems & technologies by allowing companies at any location to share data & documents securely over a single internet connection with any other member of the ecosystem. Our approach allows trading partners to collaborate and exchange data in a seamless, bi-directional, real-time manner. With security and longevity as a focus, NetDirector is a certified HIPAA Compliant and SOC II Type 2 certified company, a 6-year member of the prominent Inc. 5000, and currently processes more than 8 million transactions per month.

Disaster Recovery Planning Essential in a Connected Healthcare Environment

Disaster Recovery Planning Essential in a Connected Healthcare Environment

While we are successfully recovering from Hurricane Irma here in Tampa (with no major damage and no service outage, thankfully), the numbers have started to roll in from Harvey a few weeks ago. Despite Hurricane and Tropical Storm Harvey’s devastating impact in terms of lives lost/displaced and estimated $23 billion property damage in Texas’ Harris and Galveston counties, things could have been much worse if not for the region’s heads-up health IT disaster planning.

Four days after the storm’s landfall, all the electronic health record systems at all the hospitals in Houston appeared to be in “regular working order,” according to Nick Bonvino, CEO of Greater Houston Healthconnect (GHHC), the region’s health information exchange (HIE). GHHC had previously partnered with Health Access San Antonio, the HIE serving a large expanse of central Texas, to establish a statewide hub for Texas HIEs with remote siting and data storage in Salt Lake City.

“If a hospital backs up all of its information to a data center down the block, which is also flooded, that’s not a sufficient solution,” Andrew Gettinger, MD, chief medical information officer at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, recently told Health Data Management. “You have to think about the geography that’s likely to be at risk and make sure that your backup solution takes care of that so you can recover.”

Indeed, when Hurricane Sandy hit New York and New Jersey in 2012, healthcare data centers situated in low-lying areas — many in hospital basements — suffered catastrophic flood damage, Gettinger emphasized. Those losses underscored the need for backup systems located out of harm’s way.

Disaster recovery planning

Aside from natural disasters, health care organizations also need to prepare for cyber-threats, such as denial-of-service and ransomware attacks, which can render IT systems inoperable or data inaccessible.

According to Jeremy Molnar, vice president of services for information security firm Cynergistek, proper disaster recovery (DR) planning starts with the assignment of a project manager responsible for implementing a cohesive strategy. Other organizational experts develop needed processes and documentation to support the project manager.

Additional key aspects include:

  • identification of critical data, applications, systems, and personnel;
  • requirements for data backup and emergency-mode operations planning;
  • ongoing testing of and revisions to each component of the DR plan; and
  • assurance of contingency planning in compliance with HIPAA rules, which mandate security risk assessments. Such assessments evaluate the likelihood and impact of exposing protected health information and document the security measures adopted to address identified risks.

State of the industry

Peak 10, an IT infrastructure solutions company, found in its “IT Trends in Healthcare” study that most healthcare organizations execute DR testing less than once annually. Only 25 percent test quarterly.

What’s more eye-opening, the Disaster Recovery Preparedness Council estimates that more than 65 percent of organizations who test their DR plan actually fail their own test. Since so many organizations don’t pass their own tests, Peak 10 points out that those who neglect — or elect not to — test “simply won’t recover IT operations sufficiently if disaster [occurs], which in a hospital setting, is a risk not worth taking.”

NetDirector helps mitigate DR concerns by partnering with best-in-class technology companies to provide an “industrial-strength” data exchange platform hosted at a Peak 10 data center. Peak 10 is current with all applicable data security certifications and regulations, including HIPAA.

Additionally, NetDirector connects to multiple data centers in different geographic locations that are continuously updated and available to seamlessly go live as needed. This fault-tolerant set-up provides clients with built-in DR and hot-site swapping capabilities, ensuring minimal to zero disruption. NetDirector’s HealthData Exchange also reduces the need for scheduled maintenance and its accompanying temporary downtime.

For more information, please contact us or request a free demo.

Blockchain Technology: An Emerging Force in Healthcare Integration

Back in March, at the conclusion of the HIMSS17 annual conference, we pointed to blockchain as one of the most noteworthy recent developments in the healthcare IT space. We emphasized that blockchain technology, which uses a distributed database and cryptography to securely manage records and create a permanent record of online transactions, deserves recognition for its potential to increase IT and organizational efficiencies — highly valued attributes in light of Healthcare’s perpetually constrained resources.

An IBM Institute for Business Value study explains that data captured on blockchains can be shared in real time across a scalable group of individuals and institutions. “Every event or transaction is time-stamped and becomes part of a long chain, or permanent record, that can’t be tampered with after the fact,” according to the study report, which finds 16 percent of healthcare organizations ready to commercialize blockchain at scale in 2017.

Where will things go from here?

Room to grow

In practical terms, blockchain could be used in areas such as population health to aggregate patient and financial data that formerly would have been available only from separate sources such as health information exchanges and claims databases.

Further, blockchain’s ability to enable secure and irrevocable data exchange systems would provide “seamless access to historic and real-time data, while eliminating the burden and cost of data reconciliation,” explains Reenita Das, senior vice president of transformational healthcare at research firm Frost & Sullivan.

Micah Winkelspecht, founder and CEO of blockchain start-up Gem, characterizes blockchain as a tool for interoperability — in essence, an open-source protocol layer incorporating rules to which software can be written. “It’s basically like a language that all [participating] companies agree to speak in order to be able to interoperate with each other,” he adds. Unlike the current EHR-centric healthcare system, blockchain would be the “underlying fabric” for the entire continuum of care, “a decentralized, distributed, global data repository that’s basically shared and controlled by everyone,” he envisions.

Cross-industry philosophy

Related, in the mortgage industry, a similar foundational approach has experts believing in blockchain as an enabling technology empowering lenders to overcome current challenges in electronic processes.

Blockchain would be applied as a thin layer atop an existing document management system to effectively “freeze” a copy of the signed documentation, thereby proving it has never been altered and that the original document resides in its original location. Focus would shift from e-signature tools to blockchain as the core technology structure for compliance and document management — without requiring a completely reworked electronic process.

NetDirector recognizes ongoing and changing security needs in industries such as healthcare and mortgage banking. Companies on the front lines shouldn’t have to rewrite existing integrations or pay multiple vendors in their respective networks to operationalize individual system connections.

Within the healthcare ecosystem, NetDirector’s HealthData Exchange builds on a standard data model to map to HL7 or other data formats and achieve EHR interoperability while removing the bottlenecks of traditional interfacing. Such integrative technology holds the promise of making future security updates and landscape changes far more manageable.

For more information, please contact us or request a free demo.

What Can We Learn from eClinicalWorks’ Big Mistake?

Electronic health record (EHR) vendor eClinicalWorks (eCW) and several of its executives are on the hook for $155 million to resolve a False Claims Act lawsuit alleging that the company misrepresented the capabilities of its software. The U.S. Department of Justice announced the settlement on May 31.

Resolution of the case also required eCW to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Office of the Inspector General at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS-OIG), which oversees “meaningful use” incentive payments to healthcare providers relating to their adoption and implementation of certified EHR technology.

According to the government, eCW concealed that its software was “hardcoded” to meet certification requirements for standardized drug codes instead of actually retrieving the proper drug codes from a complete database. Other cited faults in eCW’s software included:

  • not having an audit log for accurate recording of user actions;
  • not reliably recording diagnostic imaging orders;
  • not reliably performing drug interaction checks; and
  • failing to satisfy data portability requirements for transferring patient data from eCW’s system to other vendors’ software.

All told, because of the deficiencies, “eCW caused the submission of false claims for federal incentive payments based on the use of eCW’s software,” HHS-OIG charged. $125 million of the company’s fines will go to repay Medicare and Medicaid for incentive disbursements under their respective meaningful use programs. (eCW customers who successfully attested to meaningful use in good faith will not be linked in on the government repayments.)

Aside from the financial penalties, eCW’s CIA, which extends for five years, requires the company to retain an independent oversight organization to assess its software quality control systems, with semi-annual written reports to be filed with HHS-OIG. The CIA also mandates that eCW allow its customers to obtain free software updates; customers also have the option of transferring their data to another EHR vendor without penalties or service charges.

Industry fallout

eCW agreed to the settlement without acknowledging any wrongdoing. The company said it did so to avoid lengthy and costly litigation. eCW’s EHR system remains certified under the meaningful use program. Nonetheless, the underlying facts of the case appear to have cast a broad shadow across the health IT landscape.

A report compiled by market research firm Reaction Data after announcement of the settlement found 71 percent of respondents saying they would be extremely unlikely to consider eCW in the future. What’s more, 27 percent indicated that the case had lowered confidence in their current EHR vendor, and 35 percent reported being “significantly more suspicious” of other EHR vendors.

Healthcare attorney Bob Ramsey told Healthcare Informatics that the eCW allegations may be an extreme case, but added, “Interoperability and data portability is viewed as necessary in the health world, but it’s easier said than done.”

Peter DeVault, vice president of interoperability at EHR vendor Epic, recently noted that healthcare providers would be well served to rely less on EHR certifications moving forward and to concentrate more heavily on demonstrated benefits.

NetDirector’s vendor-neutral approach to data exchange elevates providers’ ability to achieve EHR interoperability while working toward meaningful use incentives. In an environment currently clouded by skepticism, the HealthData Exchange platform automates integrations in a manner that exceeds industry standards.

NetDirector CEO Harry Beisswenger puts the technology in perspective: “It’s important for us to aid healthcare providers and vendors in reaching meaningful use benchmarks because we know that ultimately impacts the level of patient care.”

For more information, please contact us or request a free demo.

How Technology Can Aid the Opioid Crisis in America

More than 52,000 Americans died of drug overdoses in 2015 (up from about 47,000 the prior year). Among those fatalities, 63 percent were linked to opioids. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports sharp increases in deaths across many states involving heroin and synthetic opioids (largely, illicitly manufactured fentanyl) in what the agency describes as an ongoing epidemic requiring “intense attention and action.”

At the same time, prescription opioids are being misused in nonmedical ways that carry their own dangers and raise significant risk for subsequent heroin use.

CDC calls for a multifaceted response including prevention programs as well as enhanced access to treatment and harm-reduction services, while law enforcement focuses on reducing illegal opioid supply lines.

Technology plays an integral role, too — for example, streamlining access to and use of prescription drug-monitoring programs and analyzing public health data to deepen knowledge of overdose demographics.

What the numbers say

Researchers at health IT firm athenahealth studied records of more than 2 million patient visits and 500,000 opioid prescriptions written each quarter from 2014 through 2016. The analysis revealed that primary care providers write 50 percent of opioid prescriptions — far and away the most by physician type.  However, the share of primary care patients with an opioid prescription decreased from 10.6 percent at the beginning of 2014 to 9.1 percent at the end of 2016. The study also found the dosage strength of opioid prescriptions to be dropping, while the duration of prescriptions remained steady at about 23 days. According to the sample, patients over the age of 46 receive the largest share of opioid prescriptions.

A separate study conducted by the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration assessed trends and factors contributing to multiple naloxone administrations (NMAs), which are used by first responders to treat overdose patients. (Naloxone helps restore patient breathing and prevents respiratory arrest.) Tracing the MNA data enables researchers to identify when and where high-potency opioids have been introduced into a community. The findings: Significantly higher-than-expected MNAs were reported in the West, Northeast, and Midwest Census regions. “Local-level public health officials have used EMS data to create hot-spot maps of opioid overdoses and those maps are shared with program officials managing opioid overdose prevention programs,” the report states.

Automating treatment

Another key part of battling the scourge of opioid abuse is aligning recovering patients with proper medical treatment. NetDirector recently applied its integration services expertise in partnership with Addiction Care 101 (A101), which offers a platform for opioid users to anonymously go through treatment and recovery without notification of family members or employers.

NetDirector’s integration platform gives A101 the ability to accurately monitor patients’ compliance and ensure that they are not seeking drugs outside their treatment program. A101 drug counselors receive immediate alerts on out-of-compliance patients as indicated by lab testing partners within its network.

The behind-the-scenes technology integrates multiple network labs with practitioners and counselors. It supplies timely, actionable information while freeing caregivers from system-level concerns so they can concentrate on delivering needed care.

Learn more about NetDirector’s cloud-based data and document exchange solution here or request a free demo.

NetDirector Streamlines Patient Experience in Healthcare with New Health Logix Integration Suite

Tampa, FL – June 27, 2017 – NetDirector, a cloud-based data exchange and integration platform, continues to expand the presence of their cloud-based integration-platform-as-a-service (iPaaS) in the healthcare industry. In their most recent integration, NetDirector has partnered with Health Logix to deliver a technologically advanced patient experience and to streamline the process of data acquisition for providers.

Health Logix is a Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) offering delivering its customers the ability to engage patients both before and after exams or appointments by confirming scheduling, for surveys, create a seamless check-in process, and more. The cloud-based integration with NetDirector helps those clients move pertinent information directly into their Information System (RIS, EHR, HIS, etc.) and patient billing databases, to keep patient records current and to leverage collected data most efficiently.  Health Logix additionally allows for the utilization of its full functionality including automating check-in procedures at a digital kiosk, and more.

By utilizing Health Logix and integrating with NetDirector the entire continuum of healthcare data becomes more accessible to both patient and provider. Patients feel more cared for and satisfied by having reminders and surveys, while providers have the information they need faster and more cost-effectively. The information collected through Health Logix is passed through the NetDirector HealthData Exchange and is delivered directly to billing databases and information systems through a one-to-many style integration.

Health Logix chief technology officer Reynold Yordy stated that “NetDirector’s ability to simultaneously, accurately, and cost-effectively move critical patient information, to multiple partner platforms, allows us to deliver a service that both saves cost and generates real revenue to our customers.”  He further stated, “after searching for many months, we are excited to have finally found an integration partner that actually deliver on true interoperability, one of the biggest gaps in healthcare”

Interoperability has been a major hurdle in healthcare – as providers and vendors work towards Meaningful Use Stage 3, interoperability becomes critical for all systems. Communication between existing and future systems is a must have, and the NetDirector integration with Health Logix is a strong example of this kind of interconnected healthcare environment.

“It’s important for us to aid healthcare providers and vendors in reaching their Meaningful Use benchmarks because we know that ultimately impacts the level of patient care,” said Harry Beisswenger, CEO of NetDirector. “Health Logix is an exceptional system, and we’re excited to make it even easier for healthcare providers to maximize the potential it has.”

Company Bio:

NetDirector provides a secure cloud-based data and document exchange solution for the healthcare and mortgage banking industries to deliver seamless data integration between parties. NetDirector bridges gaps created by disparate systems & technologies by allowing companies at any location to share data & documents securely over a single internet connection with any other member of the ecosystem. Our approach allows trading partners to collaborate and exchange data in a seamless, bi-directional, real-time manner. With security and longevity as a focus, NetDirector is a Certified HIPAA Compliant company, a 6-year member of the prominent Inc. 5000, and currently, processes more than 9 million transactions per month.

Midyear Healthcare and Technology Progress Report

High availability, interoperability, and utility in population health management all figured prominently in an early 2017 forecast of areas where healthcare CIOs expect information technology (IT) to deliver significant impact for their organizations.

Here’s a look at how things are shaping up at the year’s midpoint.

Systems availability

While natural disasters or cyber-attacks can knock out — or lock out — critical IT systems without warning, healthcare entities still need to prepare for such events. In fact, the HIPAA Security Rule requires health care covered entities to have a contingency plan for responding to unavailability of electronic health information systems.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Inspector General reported last year in a survey of 400 hospitals that about two-thirds have contingency plans addressing data backup, disaster recovery, emergency mode operations and testing/ revision procedures. Nonetheless, over half of the surveyed hospitals confirmed an unplanned disruption to their electronic health record (EHR) system, and about a quarter of those experienced delays in patient care as a result.

So far this year, EHR outages continue to make headlines:

  • An April 2017 poll, conducted by online physician community Sermo, found that 55 percent of 1,678 responding U.S. doctors had experienced an EHR outage or malfunction that jeopardized the health or safety of a patient.
  • Also in April, Erie County Medical Center and an associated long-term care facility experienced a system-wide shutdown attributed to a ransomware attack. The hospital’s backup process prevented loss of any patient records or financial data, but its EHR was taken offline for six weeks, during which time activities such as patient admissions and prescription writing had to be handled manually.
  • In a separate incident at the end of February, an ophthalmology-specific EHR experienced “technical difficulties” due to outages of Amazon’s S3 cloud-based hosting service.

Data center and cloud services provider Peak 10 recommends that healthcare entities not only review their IT privacy and security policies and procedures but also insist that their service level agreements with technology providers specify agreed-upon security objectives and how compliance will be ensured.

Interoperability

In late March, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) shared several examples of what it described as “interoperability in action from coast to coast.” Among the programs ONC showcased:

  • An app that imports patient data — including personal and medical device data, remote monitoring and reminders — into a comprehensive family health dashboard.
  • A solution that allows clinicians to create customizable push notifications that can be tailored to individual patients or groups.
  • A smartphone app that allows patients to grant or revoke permission for providers to access, send or receive health information electronically.
  • A secure system for users to seamlessly store and share data with trusted care professionals.

Additional projects outside of ONC’s purview are taking aim at other aspects of interoperability. In April, Ascension Health, Cedars-Sinai Health System and Hospital Corporation of America opened the Center for Medical Interoperability. The lab will provide resources for researchers to test data-sharing connections for medical devices and EHRs. In February, the Personal Connected Health Alliance agreed to partner with the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise initiative in efforts to improve health data exchange through conformity testing and certification with a focus on standards-based, open specifications.

Population health

No single type of data serves as a comprehensive source of information for population health management. For example, claims data includes patient demographics, diagnosis codes, and dates and costs of services; however, the information is retrospective and limited to just billable aspects of care, explains a recent HealthITAnalytics report. Likewise, EHR systems provide clinical details but often contain unstructured, free-text descriptions that are difficult to extract and analyze.

Still, healthcare organizations continue to press forward with population health initiatives. Vanderbilt University just released a report card — the first of its kind in the nation — intended to guide the planning, implementation, and evaluation of programs and policies to improve men’s health across the entire state of Tennessee. It identifies heart disease and cancer as the leading causes of death in the state and reveals a deficit in men having a personal health provider. Meanwhile, Stanford University’s Center for Population Health Sciences has awarded $275,000 in pilot grants to fund studies seeking to improve population and community health, including a mobile surveillance system that will map autism and gaps in treatment services.

Efforts such as these will help drive discovery of what works in real-world practice of population health management. “As an industry, we can increase the socialization of toolkits and case studies so that healthcare organizations can more clearly define all aspects of population health management model design,” observes Jennifer Rogers, an analyst at Chilmark Research. She adds that optimal IT deployment will speed up gains in value for current and future adopters of population health models.

Availability, interoperability, and population health projects face a balance of challenges and opportunities as we enter the second half of 2017. NetDirector continues to innovate with cloud-based, foundational integration solutions that will help healthcare organizations seamlessly handle the electronic exchange of information in each of these areas within their respective ecosystems. For more information, please contact us or request a free demo.

Addiction Care 101 Partners with NetDirector to Automate Key Pieces of the Opioid Addiction Recovery Process

Tampa, FL – June 13, 2017 – NetDirector, a cloud-based data exchange and integration platform, continues to solidify their presence in the healthcare industry as a leading provider of integration services. Most recently, NetDirector has partnered with Addiction Care 101 to aid in the delivery of treatment for the growing opioid crisis around the country.

Addiction Care 101 (A101) is a cloud-based software platform that assists doctors in performing Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for people with prescription opioid and heroin use disorders. Medications (such as Suboxone) are used to prevent the patient from experiencing opioid withdrawal while they receive the necessary treatment, provided via telemedicine by their network of doctors and therapists to assist their recovery.

The software is based on a proven, successful model delivered on a solid platform of risk management and compliance to physicians and patients. The A101 platform allows for users to anonymously go through treatment and recovery without requiring family or employers to know. Technology including telemedicine and e-prescribing allows members (assisted by the network of doctors, drug counselors, and the A101 team) to pursue sobriety without having to worry about being seen in an addiction care facility.

Laurie Peregoy JD, Director of Program Compliance, states that “NetDirector’s cutting edge integration technology allows A101 to more accurately monitor their member’s compliance. Specifically, the ease in which we are able to routinely access the Controlled Substance Database using their automated process gives A101 the critical assurance that members are not seeking drugs beyond their treatment program.”

By providing an automated integration to Controlled Substance Databases, NetDirector helps prevent “medication farming” – a major contributor to the abuse of opioid recovery drugs that has hindered the opioid rehabilitation efforts in the past.

William Beasley, one of A101’s network of Drug Counselors, further stated “NetDirector’s bidirectional integration with our lab testing partners makes my job of treating my patients more thorough due to immediate alerts to both myself and my patient if the results expose compliance or other potentially life-threatening outcomes.”

By integrating with labs via a cloud-based, one-to-many style integration, NetDirector allows the practitioners and counselors that are part of the A101 network to stay informed and to expand their ability to treat opioid addiction disorders in recovery patients with greater accuracy. The compliance gains noted by A101 are a key benefit to the integration, as well, so that the program can continue to function while maintaining the highest levels of transparency and discretion when needed.

Company Bio:

NetDirector provides a secure cloud-based data and document exchange solution for the healthcare and mortgage banking industries to deliver seamless data integration between parties. NetDirector bridges gaps created by disparate systems & technologies by allowing companies at any location to share data & documents securely over a single internet connection with any other member of the ecosystem. Our approach allows trading partners to collaborate and exchange data in a seamless, bi-directional, real-time manner. With security and longevity as a focus, NetDirector is a certified HIPAA Compliant company, a 6-year member of the prominent Inc. 5000, and currently processes more than 9 million transactions per month.

When a Health IT Rollout Runs Off the Rails

If ever a large-scale health IT project needed a reboot, it was the rollout of Healthcare.gov. Fortunately, it got one — in the form of an emergency, behind-the-scenes “tech surge” assembled to salvage the government’s new health insurance portal after a halting launch.

To recap, only six people completed the online enrollment process on Oct. 1, 2013, the day Healthcare.gov officially opened for business, according to notes from war room meetings at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency charged with implementing the site. Things didn’t improve much the next two days, with a cumulative total of 248 enrollments successfully submitted and at times up to 40,000 consumers stuck in a waiting stage.

Malfunctions crashed Healthcare.gov twice more the last week of October, the second time while Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), the parent department of CMS, was testifying before Congress about the website’s problems.

Administration officials advised consumers who experienced trouble with the online process to apply by phone — or even mail in a hard copy form.

President Obama called it a “well-documented disaster” and pundits had a field day.

“Only the government could come up with a website that’s slower than sending something by mail.” — Jay Leno

“If you are in need of healthcare, you have two choices: You can wait for them to get the site fixed, or you can enroll in medical school, graduate, and then just take care of yourself.” — Jimmy Kimmel

“People are getting a busy signal when they try to apply over the phone. You can’t use the Internet and you can’t use the phone. So now fax machines are like, ‘Look who’s come crawling back!’” — Jimmy Fallon

To its credit, the administration retooled and relaunched the site by December 2013 and hit its stated goal of signing up 7 million people by the end of the first quarter of 2014. Nonetheless, substantial damage had already been done. Hundreds of millions of dollars had been spent, and by April 2014 Sebelius had resigned after taking ultimate responsibility for the launch debacle.

What went wrong

In retrospect, the management and technical problems that plagued Healthcare.gov throughout its development seem fairly apparent.

A February 2016 report issued by HHS’ Office of the Inspector General stated that the most critical misstep made by the project team leading up to launch was “absence of clear leadership, which caused delays in decision-making, lack of clarity in project tasks and the inability of CMS to recognize the magnitude of problems as the project deteriorated.” Other contributing factors included devoting too much time to policy issues rather than to actual site development, poor technical decisions and improper management of the key development contract. The report also criticized CMS’ organizational structure and culture, which hampered coordination, pushed back against warnings of “bad news” and failed to alter plans in the face of problems.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), in a separate analysis, pointed out CMS shortcomings in the areas of capacity planning for the site, as well as failure to correct software coding errors and implement full functionality prior to launch. Additionally, GAO said, “Healthcare.gov and its supporting systems were not fully tested prior to launch, and test documentation was missing key elements such as criteria for determining whether a system passed a test.”

A CIO retrospective summarized the project’s faults and how the fiasco could have been prevented: “Healthcare.gov was a single, Big Bang rollout that couldn’t be stopped.” The huge undertaking should have been tracked forward in incremental stages, with early and complete testing, and a more flexible scope to find areas of risk before they unexpectedly appeared.

Not a singular instance

Despite all the negative fallout, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised with Healthcare.gov’s early-phase stumbles. Standish Group, an advisory firm focusing on software project performance, studied 3,555 projects from 2003 through 2012 that had labor costs of at least $10 million.

The takeaway: Only about 6 percent were deemed successful. A majority, 52 percent were “challenged” — meaning over budget, behind schedule or failed to meet user expectations. The rest, about 42 percent, were either scrapped or started anew from scratch.

Further research, from Forrester Consulting, shows that less than 40 percent of IT executives believe their internal IT organizations can regularly deliver projects on time and within budget, due in large part to continually changing user requirements and overburdened departmental resources.

In general commercial environments, such a low success rate may be accepted as a “cost of doing business,” and the worst outcome could be scope creep or project delays. In healthcare, the stakes are higher, with patient lives potentially on the line when IT systems don’t work or aren’t available when needed. That’s why many healthcare entities are looking for trusted third-party help in gaining control over their interconnected systems and expanding ecosystems.

NetDirector has been around for almost 15 years, offering cloud-based services that are now considered a staple solution for data integration in healthcare and other industries. Learn more about the HealthData Exchange platform here or request a free demo.